Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jil Teichmann vs Carolina Kuhl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Teichmann vs Kuhl analysis and find out who is favored!
Jil Teichmann vs Carolina Kuhl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Teichmann 1 - 0 Kuhl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Teichmann has won 49.01% of points on his second serve, while Kuhl has won 46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Teichmann, in recent form, has won 55.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kuhl has won 60.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.26% and 43.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Teichmann has saved 55.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kuhl has saved 48.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Teichmann has won 52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 24), with Kuhl winning 62.9% (W/L 39/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Teichmann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 177/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Kuhl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 29/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Teichmann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.38% of matches (W/L 17/ 9), where as Kuhl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.82% of matches (W/L 25/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Teichmann winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Teichmann winning 2 and Kuhl winning 0. The last match between Teichmann and Kuhl was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 04-05-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jil Teichmann getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Teichmann and Kuhl have played a deciding set 0 times, with Teichmann winning 0 times and Kuhl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Teichmann winning 0, and Kuhl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Teichmann has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.7 while Kuhl has played against players with an average rank of 322.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Teichmann has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kuhl has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Teichmann has converted 46.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kuhl has converted 54.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Teichmann 1 - 0 Kuhl
230
Rank
21
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
400
Rank
400
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
57% (298-223)
Career Total W/L
60% (58-38)
67% (14-7)
YTD W/L
61% (20-13)
$1,804,551
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jil Teichmann | Carolina Kuhl |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) | 48% (22/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (24/33) | 77% (17/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 33% (8/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (21/46) | 32% (18/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jil Teichmann | Carolina Kuhl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (14/7) | 61% (20/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (30/17) | 61% (45/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (228/174) | 56% (369/286) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 59% (10/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 77 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:8 | 1:44:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 231.1 | 279.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (850/1305) | 63% (1321/2108) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (537/850) | 61% (809/1321) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (223/455) | 46% (365/787) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (86/185) | 56% (166/296) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (640/1356) | 50% (1087/2160) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 55% (11/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (14/20) | 63% (20/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 82% (22/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 18% (22/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 18% (11/2) |
Jil Teichmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Jil Teichmann
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Iva Primorac
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Simona Waltert
72%
(
81 of
113)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
57 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Dora Miskovic
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
82%
(
81 of
99)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
50 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Sofia Shapatava
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Monique Barry
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Jil Teichmann
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
44%
(
27 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
45 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Melisa Ercan
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Angelica Raggi
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
49 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Viola Turini
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Solana Sierra
76%
(
80 of
105)
1st Serve %
74%
(
84 of
113)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
64 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Carolina Kuhl
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nigina Abduraimova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Teichmann Vs Kuhl Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
